The PP indicates that “the testimony of Mr. García Ortiz is necessary to clarify: whether he was aware, directly or indirectly, of the content of the meetings held by the members of the Technical Secretariat with Mr. Jacobo Teijelo Casanova and, where applicable, with Ms. Leire Díez; information received and documents and complaints mentioned; the reasons why no procedural action was promoted despite the potential criminal relevance noted by the intervening prosecutors; and the criteria followed so that such contacts are not reflected in any formal record of the institution. »

Síguenos en nuestro canal whatsapp y no te pierdas las últimas novedades y todas las novedades de nuestra perfil de google.